Sie sind hier: Startseite / Users / Berndt Strobach / Bei Liquiditätsproblemen: Folter
Social Media Buttons fb twitter twitter twitter
  • Metadaten

    • Dokumenttyp
      Präsentation (Monographie)
      Autor (Präsentation)
      • Strobach, Berndt
      Sprache (Präsentation)
      English
      Sprache (Monographie)
      Deutsch
      Autor (Monographie)
      • Strobach, Berndt
      Titel
      Bei Liquiditätsproblemen: Folter
      Untertitel
      Das Verfahren gegen die jüdischen Kaufleute Gumpert und Isaak Behrens in Hannover, 1721–1726
      Erscheinungsjahr
      2013
      Verlag
      epubli
      Umfang
      136
      ISBN
      978-3844249866
      Thematische Klassifikation
      Jüdische Geschichte, Wirtschaftsgeschichte, Rechtsgeschichte, Sozial- und Kulturgeschichte
      Zeitliche Klassifikation
      Neuzeit bis 1900 → 18. Jh.
      Regionale Klassifikation
      Europa → Westeuropa → Deutschland
      Schlagwörter
      Georg <I., England, König>
      Hannover <Kurfürstentum>
      Hofjuden
      Prozess
      Lehmann, Berend / Nachlass
      Folter
      recensio-ID
      14127141c4744f9aa8d4412c5a0c6d76
  • Zitierhinweis

  • Lizenzhinweis

    • Dieser Beitrag unterliegt der Creative-Commons-Lizenz Namensnennung-Keine kommerzielle Nutzung-Keine Bearbeitung (CC-BY-NC-ND), darf also unter diesen Bedingungen elektronisch benutzt, übermittelt, ausgedruckt und zum Download bereitgestellt werden. Den Text der Lizenz erreichen Sie hier:

      http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/de
  • Links

    • Diese Schrift ist nicht online abrufbar.

Berndt Strobach: Bei Liquiditätsproblemen: Folter. Das Verfahren gegen die jüdischen Kaufleute Gumpert und Isaak Behrens in Hannover, 1721–1726 (präsentiert von Berndt Strobach)

The author describes, from the files in the Hannover state archives, the case of the two Jewish merchants and manufacturers Gumpert and Isaak Behrens, who, in 1721, were accused of fraudulent bankruptcy. The brothers’ financial situation was indeed precarious, and the charge was based on the suspicion they might have embezzled considerable values from the estate and hoarded them with Isaak’s father-in-law, the renowned court Jew Berend Lehmann of Halberstadt.

The justice authorities of the electorate of Hannover could not corroborate the charge and consequently tortured the defendants to make them confess (to no avail).

The author had noticed that this episode was widely mentioned in court Jew literature and interpreted in biased ways: Jewish historiographers (Emil Lehmann, Benjamin Auerbach, Selma Stern, Pierre Saville) maintained the Behrens brothers as well as Berend Lehmann were innocent, whereas two non-Jewish racist authors (Peter Deeg, Heinrich Schnee) took it for granted that they were guilty.

Strobach points out that Schnee, the only author to have studied the files, identified himself lightheartedly with the contemporary indictment and did not even mention the extensive defence plea put forward by a conscientious Christian advocate who ascertained there was no proof whatsoever of the alleged fraud. The result of Strobach’s new assessment of the archival evidence is that the Jews were indeed very probably not guilty though partly responsible for the decline of their business through mismanagement and sumptuous living.

Why were the Behrenses tortured in a money case in an age when otherwise only murderers and robbers were? Considering other instances of the still rather frequent use of torture in Hannover Strobach suggests that the Behrenses were the victims of anti-Judaic resentment and of the frustration of creditors in an atmosphere of insecurity (cf. the South Sea and Mississippi Company Bubbles).

The failure of the Behrens’ firm against a background of irresponsible borrowing and lending, to Strobach’s mind, is a typical example of the effects of the macro-economic situation on individual business activities.

Similarly he finds that the contemporary legal system in Germany aggravated the brothers’ situation as their opportunities for appeal were scarce and the Jewish community was too weak to help (considering Stephan Wendehorst’s and Andreas Gotzmann’s recent approaach of “Juden im Recht”).

The author hopes to have contributed the analysis of a hitherto practically unknown case with wide implications in the fields of Jewish affairs as well as of economic and legal history.

Alongside with 90 pages of descriptive and argumentative text the book contains 44 pages of documents transcribed from the files.